- #Silverfast vs viewscan vs nikon scan upgrade
- #Silverfast vs viewscan vs nikon scan full
- #Silverfast vs viewscan vs nikon scan pro
- #Silverfast vs viewscan vs nikon scan software
- #Silverfast vs viewscan vs nikon scan trial
Once the image is selected, we get to the nitty-gritty.
#Silverfast vs viewscan vs nikon scan software
The tradeoff, of course, is that the zoomed in image in VueScan is not very high resolution, but if you want to get in and out of the software quickly, this greatly cuts down on your time. When using Silverfast or Epson Scan, each time you zoom in on a selection the scanner will re-scan the image. A plus in VueScan's corner here is that you can zoom in on an image without the scanner making a slightly more detailed scan. Once we've previewed the whole sheet, we select a shot to zoom in on and work with. Previewing an entire sheet of film in Vuescan. More on that while we are fine-tuning our scans. There are a plethora of options under each subsection, and although some do have sliders, it's difficult to determine what does what without some experimentation.
#Silverfast vs viewscan vs nikon scan trial
A lot of my working through VueScan has been trial and error. Unfortunately, that's about where the user friendliness ends. There are six tabs on the left moving from "Input" on the far left to "Output" and "Prefs" on the right. There are hardly any graphic elements to be found. This software, visually, seems like a flashback from the nineties. When you get into VueScan, the first thing you're going to notice is the Spartan nature of the user interface. I'll step through my own scanning workflow and we will see how VueScan helps or hinders my own efficiency.
![silverfast vs viewscan vs nikon scan silverfast vs viewscan vs nikon scan](https://www.silverfast.com/img/newsletter200812/time_en.jpg)
It's difficult to review a software package without comparing it to other packages that I'm familiar with, so in this review, I'll be comparing VueScan to Epson Scan, the free software that comes with any Epson scanner, and SilverFast 8.8. As long as you get the image you want, do it the way you want. There's no right or wrong here, just personal preference. For myself, I'd rather get as much as I can done in the scanning software so that my Photoshop time is limited to retouching. Your choice of software can have a lot to do with where you land on the spectrum. There are generally two schools of thought when it comes to scanning: do as much of the work as you can while scanning, or get as much information as you can out of the scan and do the rest in Photoshop and Lightroom.
![silverfast vs viewscan vs nikon scan silverfast vs viewscan vs nikon scan](https://s3.theasianparent.com/tap-assets-prod/wp-content/uploads/sites/24/2021/06/nasywa-9.jpg)
It's through that lens that we take a look at VueScan. Your choice of software has a lot to do with how efficient and how tolerable it will be to get your negatives into the computer. Most of us want to get in, get the best scan we can, and get out to the greener pastures of Photoshop to make our final edits. For those that choose to develop their film at home, scanning is the next step in our workflow. You could argue that outside of the moment of exposure, scanning carries the most weight in determining the quality of the final image. If you're not printing in the darkroom, it's a necessary evil when dealing with film.
![silverfast vs viewscan vs nikon scan silverfast vs viewscan vs nikon scan](https://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue55/10/images/figure14b1.jpg)
Don't believe it was supported under Vuescan for my scanners. Your Nikon probably does a good job figuring out color already.ĮDIT: I don't remember much about digital ICE.
#Silverfast vs viewscan vs nikon scan upgrade
It cost $$150 to upgrade my Silverfast to have that capability. Might help if you have a really badly exposed slide, but heck, if the slide is bad, I don't try too hard to save them.Ĭolor calibration would be nice. Cost is much bigger files, possible incompatibility with PC browsers/viewers and a need to convert to JPG if others are to view and print.
#Silverfast vs viewscan vs nikon scan pro
The Pro Version is supposedly the same interface, but you get RAW and color calibration.įor cameras, RAW stores the image with more bits/pixel which allows more image recovery if you blow the exposure and white balance. I recall that it wasn't hard to figure out as a program. Nice generic program., but I saw no advantage over the Silverfast SE and Epson Scan that came with scanners I already own., so I uninstalled it w/o any lasting effects on my PC.
#Silverfast vs viewscan vs nikon scan full
They put a watermark on the scans until you pay for it, but the scans had the full resolution for comparison. Thank you.ĭownload it as a trial and try it out. Hamrick's website, I guess it makes sense to start with the 30-day free trial version.Īny ideas and suggestions would be greatly appreciated. At any rate, if it's necessary to buy from Mr. At this point I don't know which version to buy - regular or Pro, since I don't know if I would need the extra features. I presume the program can be downloaded and that a disc can also be purchased. Is there any way to purchase VueScan other than from creator Ed Hamrick's website? Apparently it's not available at stores such as Best Buy.
![silverfast vs viewscan vs nikon scan silverfast vs viewscan vs nikon scan](http://www.astroarts.co.jp/news/2003/10/31coolscan/coolscan_5000.jpg)
How does it compare in ease-of-use and quality-of-results with Nikon Scan? From what I've read here it definitely sounds like VueScan is the better option. I contacted Nikon and was told to try either VueScan or Silverfast. (My scanner is a Nikon Coolscan V ED.) Immediately I discovered that Nikon Scan doesn't work with Windows 7 - at least not yet. I just set up my new Windows 7 computer and expected to resume scanning my aunt's vast slide collection and using Nikon Scan.